Compare SaaS Products
Compare up to 4 software products side by side. Find the best solution for your business.
Add Products to Compare
2 of 4 products selected
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
4.2
|
4.1
|
| Reviews | 15 | 7 |
| Category | Biotech | Biotech |
| Description |
Angstrom AI builds GenAI-based molecular simulations to substitute wet lab experiments in the pre-clinical drug development pipeline. We are a team of 2 PhD's and 2 Professors from the University of Cambridge who decided to start a company together after we realised how to combine breakthoughs in our research in quantum-accurate models of physics and generative AI models. Our Biotech/Pharma clients can verify the efficacy and safety of new drug candidates using our computer simulations, which match the accuracy of wet lab experiments, but are over 100x faster. We achieve this accuracy by constraining our genAI-based simulations to obey the laws of physics, avoiding the hallucinations seen in other GenAI technologies. Since joining YC, Angstrom AI has developed the first physically accurate gen-AI based simulation of multiple molecules interacting. We have published the first molecule water solubility results with accuracy within the error range of wet lab experiments. We have also kicked-off a 150K pilot project with a pharma company to apply our tech to estimating solubility in their drug development pipeline. |
You can think of Stempad as a Notion for science. It is the world's first true pen-and-paper alternative to fast scientific writing and collaborating. Quickly switch between different forms of technical visualization with the ease of a whiteboard and the convenience of your keyboard. Stempad allows you to share your work, collaborate in real time, store your data, annotate, write papers, plan, takes notes, create presentations, and so much more. Our vision is to make it easier and faster for students and scientists to digitize and share their scientific ideas. |
| Website | https://www.angstrom-ai.com | https://www.stempad.com |
| Positives |
"Great tool! Exactly what we needed for our workflow."
Diana Bauch - 5/5
|
"Easy to set up and get started. Very intuitive."
Caden Johns Jr. - 5/5
|
| Negatives |
"Too complex for our needs. Not user-friendly."
Estefania Kirlin - 2/5
|
"Integration was difficult and documentation was unclear."
Jarred Turner - 2/5
|
| Details | View Full Review → | View Full Review → |